Robertson v. Fleitman

Second Circuit

Robertson v. Fleitman

91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 689, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2098

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 5, 1899·No. No. 6·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.

Robertson v. Fleitman, 91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 689, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2098 (2d Cir. 1899).

Pincite

91 F. 1004 (Robertson v. Fleitman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related