Robertson v. Fleitman

Second Circuit

Robertson v. Fleitman

91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 689, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2098

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1899

DocketNo. 6

StatusPublished

This text of 91 F. 1004 (Robertson v. Fleitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Fleitman, 91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 689, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2098 (2d Cir. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 F. 1004, 34 C.C.A. 689, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-fleitman-ca2-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack