Robertson v. Ewing

Indiana Court of Appeals

Robertson v. Ewing

135 N.E. 491, 78 Ind. App. 307, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 112

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 1922·No. No. 11,346·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Enloe, J.

— The appellant having shown prima facie error, the failure of the appellee to file a brief will, under the authority of Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 103 N. E. 1, and Roberts v. Fessler (1920), 74 Ind. App. 333, 128 N. E. 359, be treated as a confession of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to set aside the order dismissing appellant’s complaint, and for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enloe, J.

— The appellant having shown prima facie error, the failure of the appellee to file a brief will, under the authority of Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 103 N. E. 1, and Roberts v. Fessler (1920), 74 Ind. App. 333, 128 N. E. 359, be treated as a confession of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to set aside the order dismissing appellant’s complaint, and for further proceedings.

Robertson v. Ewing, 135 N.E. 491, 78 Ind. App. 307, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 112 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

135 N.E. 491 (Robertson v. Ewing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related