Robertson v. Ewing

Indiana Court of Appeals

Robertson v. Ewing

135 N.E. 491, 78 Ind. App. 307, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 112

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1922

DocketNo. 11,346

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 135 N.E. 491 (Robertson v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Ewing, 135 N.E. 491, 78 Ind. App. 307, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 112 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Enloe, J.

— The appellant having shown prima facie error, the failure of the appellee to file a brief will, under the authority of Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 103 N. E. 1, and Roberts v. Fessler (1920), 74 Ind. App. 333, 128 N. E. 359, be treated as a confession of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to set aside the order dismissing appellant’s complaint, and for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enloe, J.

— The appellant having shown prima facie error, the failure of the appellee to file a brief will, under the authority of Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 103 N. E. 1, and Roberts v. Fessler (1920), 74 Ind. App. 333, 128 N. E. 359, be treated as a confession of error.

The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to set aside the order dismissing appellant’s complaint, and for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 N.E. 491, 78 Ind. App. 307, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-ewing-indctapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack