Robertson v. Depriest

Supreme Court of Virginia

Robertson v. Depriest

6 Va. 469

DecidedJanuary 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 469 (Robertson v. Depriest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Depriest, 6 Va. 469 (Va. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The following was the opinion of this Court.

The Court

is of opinion that the judgment of the County Court is erroneous in this, that it was irregular to reject the witnesses offered on the part of the appellant, on the ground that the items which they were brought to support, had been decided on in a former suit between the same parties, the record in which suit was no how exhibited to the Court.

[470]*470Both judgments are therefore, reverse(1 with costs, anti the. cause is remanded for a new trial to be bad between the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following was the opinion of this Court.

The Court

is of opinion that the judgment of the County Court is erroneous in this, that it was irregular to reject the witnesses offered on the part of the appellant, on the ground that the items which they were brought to support, had been decided on in a former suit between the same parties, the record in which suit was no how exhibited to the Court.

[470]*470Both judgments are therefore, reverse(1 with costs, anti the. cause is remanded for a new trial to be bad between the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-depriest-va-1820.