Robertson v. Cree, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robertson v. Cree, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F. App'x 307
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2010·No. 10-1393·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1393

DEBRA I. ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CREE, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00013-H)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debra I. Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard D. Haygood, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Debra I. Robertson appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on

Robertson’s claims of gender and race discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Robertson v. Cree, Inc., No. 5:08-cv-00013-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robertson v. Cree, Inc., (4th Cir. 2010).

Robertson v. Cree, Inc. (Robertson v. Cree, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.