Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.

61 Ga. App. 762

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 28, 1940·No. 28033·Published

Opinion

Guerry, J.

I. The evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to authorize a finding that if the purchase of the property was unauthorized in the first instance, the defendant, by her conduct, had estopped herself to [763] deny that the property sued for was purchased for her benefit and in her behalf.

Decided February 28, 1940. R. B. Pullen, for plaintiff in error. G. B. Tidwell, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and- MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

I. The evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to authorize a finding that if the purchase of the property was unauthorized in the first instance, the defendant, by her conduct, had estopped herself to [763] deny that the property sued for was purchased for her benefit and in her behalf.

Decided February 28, 1940. R. B. Pullen, for plaintiff in error. G. B. Tidwell, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and- MacIntyre, J., concur.

Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co., 61 Ga. App. 762 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

61 Ga. App. 762 (Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.