Robertson v. Byrne
This text of 93 S.E. 895 (Robertson v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in directing the verdict on the traverse of the return of service, there being no issue of fact.
2. The court did not err in ruling that the service was sufficient.
3. Agency can not be proved by testimony of the sayings of the alleged agent, though made dum fervet opus. Massillon Engine Co. v. Akerman, 110 Ga. 570 (35 S. E. 635).
4. The evidence supported the verdict, and the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff on the merits of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 895, 147 Ga. 329, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-byrne-ga-1917.