Robertson v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Robertson v. Brown

145 A. 925, 7 N.J. Misc. 413, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 298

DecidedApril 19, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 145 A. 925 (Robertson v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robertson v. Brown, 145 A. 925, 7 N.J. Misc. 413, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

This action was-brought to recover compensation for personal injuries. The injuries sued for occurred to the plaintiff on July 30th, 1927, while he was riding a bicycle along Monmouth avenue, in the township of Lakewood. The defendant Cuba Brown was operating an auto truck belonging to the defendant Harry T. Theobold, which collided-"with, the plaintiff’s bicycle, causing the injuries complained of. Negligence of the defendants is alleged in the complaint.

The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down .seventeen reasons for the granting of a new trial. We find no substantial reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury. The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjeiam.

This action was-brought to recover compensation for personal injuries. The injuries sued for occurred to the plaintiff on July 30th, 1927, while he was riding a bicycle along Monmouth avenue, in the township of Lakewood. The defendant Cuba Brown was operating an auto truck belonging to the defendant Harry T. Theobold, which collided-"with, the plaintiff’s bicycle, causing the injuries complained of. Negligence of the defendants is alleged in the complaint.

The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $10,000. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down .seventeen reasons for the granting of a new trial. We find no substantial reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury. The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 A. 925, 7 N.J. Misc. 413, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-brown-nj-1929.