Robertson v. BLUE WATER OIL COMPANY
This text of 726 N.W.2d 6 (Robertson v. BLUE WATER OIL COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Philip ROBERTSON and Sharon Robertson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
BLUE WATER OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's October 27, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
WEAVER, J.,
would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal and ask the parties to brief the issue whether Mann v. Shusteric Enterprises Inc., 470 Mich. 320, 683 N.W.2d 573 (2004), was correctly decided.
MARKMAN, J.,
would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant defendant's application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in Robertson v. *7 Blue Water Oil Co., 477 Mich. 897, 722 N.W.2d 659 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
726 N.W.2d 6, 477 Mich. 1007, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-v-blue-water-oil-company-mich-2007.