Robertson, Hudson & Pulliam v. Fullerton & Myer

15 La. Ann. 318
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 15 La. Ann. 318 (Robertson, Hudson & Pulliam v. Fullerton & Myer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robertson, Hudson & Pulliam v. Fullerton & Myer, 15 La. Ann. 318 (La. 1860).

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

This is a suit upon a note payable to plaintiffs, signed “ Fullerton <& Myer.”

Defendants are described in the petition as a commercial firm, established and doing business in Texas.

Citation was served on Samuel W. Fullerton, who defends the suit individually, denying the partnership charged, and denying that he signed or authorized any other person to sign the note.

The partnership of Fullerton & Myer is proved by a witness examined under commission, and whose deposition was admitted without objection.

The note was also given in evidence without objection.

It is urged by counsel of defendants, that the signature of the note was not proved, although specially denied.

The offering of a note in evidence upon trial, without objection, dispenses with the necessity of proving the signatures upon the note necessary to charge the party against whom the note is offered. Maxwell v. Kennedy, 10 An. 798; Tyler v. Marcellin, 8 An. 312.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Land, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. Ann. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robertson-hudson-pulliam-v-fullerton-myer-la-1860.