Robertson Co. v. Beall
251 S.W. 1119, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 220
Opinion
The first three items of expense mentioned in the third paragraph of the court’s conclusions of law were not occasioned by unavoidable casualties within the meaning of the lease contract. Tays v. Ecker, 6 Tex. Civ. App. 188, 24 S. W. 954; Welles v. Castles; 3 Gray, (Mass.) 323. The tenant was therefore liable therefor.
As to the remaining item' mentioned in said paragraph, the evidence supports the finding that it was not due to ordinary wear and tear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robertson Co. v. Beall, 251 S.W. 1119, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 220 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).
251 S.W. 1119 (Robertson Co. v. Beall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tays v. Ecker
24 S.W. 954 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1894)