Roberts v. William Rowan & Co.

2 Del. 314
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 5, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. 314 (Roberts v. William Rowan & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. William Rowan & Co., 2 Del. 314 (Del. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

The Court

said that the 2d and 4th exceptions were both fatal. The principle decided in Cohsberry vs. Stoops (1 Harr. 448,) was, that where it appeared from the record that the proof and allegations were heard by the justice, it would be sufficient without his so stating. Here the justice sets out the cause of action, being an account, and which is the allegation of the plaintiff; but it does not appear that it was in any manner proved, even by the production and proof of his books. But the other ground is also fatal. A firm, cannot sue without setting out its members, and it is a good objection on the general issue, and need not be pleaded in abatement.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Del. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-william-rowan-co-delsuperct-1837.