Roberts v. Washington Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Roberts v. Washington Trust Co.

187 A. 386, 323 Pa. 442, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 917

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. Washington Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 313 Pa. 584 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 5, 1936·No. Appeal, 223·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The questions raised by this appeal were decided in Roberts v. Washington Trust Co., 313 Pa. 584, with the possible exception of the President Judge declining to participate in the trial of the case. His action was per *443 fectly proper. Judge Cummins and Judge Hughes constituted the remainder of the court and they disposed of the questions: Crawford’s Estate, 307 Pa. 102, 105.

Judgment affirmed at the cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The questions raised by this appeal were decided in Roberts v. Washington Trust Co., 313 Pa. 584, with the possible exception of the President Judge declining to participate in the trial of the case. His action was per *443 fectly proper. Judge Cummins and Judge Hughes constituted the remainder of the court and they disposed of the questions: Crawford’s Estate, 307 Pa. 102, 105.

Judgment affirmed at the cost of appellants.

Roberts v. Washington Trust Co., 187 A. 386, 323 Pa. 442, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 917 (Pa. 1936).

Pincite

187 A. 386 (Roberts v. Washington Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related