Roberts v. Virginia Beach Court House

667 F. App'x 418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1008
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 418 (Roberts v. Virginia Beach Court House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Virginia Beach Court House, 667 F. App'x 418 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel A. Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2012). On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Roberts’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s disposi-tive analysis, Roberts has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Roberts’ motion to reconsider. We [419]*419dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-virginia-beach-court-house-ca4-2016.