Roberts v. United States District Court

338 U.S. 807, 70 S. Ct. 38, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1894
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 1949
DocketNo. 2, Misc.
StatusPublished

This text of 338 U.S. 807 (Roberts v. United States District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. United States District Court, 338 U.S. 807, 70 S. Ct. 38, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1894 (1949).

Opinion

It is ordered that Max Radin, Esquire, of Berkeley, California, a member of the bar of this Court, be appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 U.S. 807, 70 S. Ct. 38, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-united-states-district-court-scotus-1949.