Roberts v. Trammell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Roberts v. Trammell

49 N.E. 1107, 19 Ind. App. 709, 1898 Ind. App. LEXIS 83

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1898

DocketNo. 2,362

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 N.E. 1107 (Roberts v. Trammell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Trammell, 49 N.E. 1107, 19 Ind. App. 709, 1898 Ind. App. LEXIS 83 (Ind. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Comstock, J.

— Replevin, trial by jury, verdict and judgment for appellees, (defendants below). The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for anewtrial. The record contains no pleading but the complaint. It attempts to set out only a part of the evidence.

[710]*710The motion for a new trial contains nine reasons; five of them are for alleged errors in giving certain instructions. The instructions considered together are correct as abstract propositions of law. The defective condition of the record precludes the consideration of the other reasons set out in said motion. See Reid v. Reid, 149 Ind. 274. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Comstock, J.

— Replevin, trial by jury, verdict and judgment for appellees, (defendants below). The only error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for anewtrial. The record contains no pleading but the complaint. It attempts to set out only a part of the evidence.

[710]*710The motion for a new trial contains nine reasons; five of them are for alleged errors in giving certain instructions. The instructions considered together are correct as abstract propositions of law. The defective condition of the record precludes the consideration of the other reasons set out in said motion. See Reid v. Reid, 149 Ind. 274. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 N.E. 1107, 19 Ind. App. 709, 1898 Ind. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-trammell-indctapp-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack