Roberts v. Township of Charlevoix

26 N.W. 878, 60 Mich. 197, 1886 Mich. LEXIS 569
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.

Plaintiff sued to recover back the taxes, •which he paid under protest, which were levied on his tug, •enrolled and licensed under the acts of Congress, and used at the time in the navigable waters of this State. The facts found by the court below show that plaintiff is not, and was not, a resident of Michigan, but of Dakota, and that he paid taxes there on this same property.

The decisions of the United States supreme court have uniformly held that a vessel enrolled and licensed or registered under the United States navigation laws does not, by engaging in business within a state, become subject to its taxing power, if the owner is a non-resident: Hays v. Steam [198]*198ship Co., 17 How. 596 ; St. Louis v. Ferry Co., 11 Wall. 423 ; Morgan v. Parham, 16 Wall. 471.

This doctrine having been settled by the court of last resort, there would be no propriety in discussing it. This-case comes directly within the decisions, and the tax was void.

Plaintiff is entitled to judgment for $33.89.

The judgment below must be reversed, with costs of all the courts, and judgment rendered here accordingly.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Township of Charlevoix, 26 N.W. 878, 60 Mich. 197, 1886 Mich. LEXIS 569 (Mich. 1886).

26 N.W. 878 (Roberts v. Township of Charlevoix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yost v. Lake Erie Transp. Co.
112 F. 746 (Sixth Circuit, 1901)
North Western Lumber Co. v. Chehalis County
64 P. 909 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
Johnson v. DeBary-Baya Merchants' Line
37 Fla. 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)