Roberts v. Town of Perry
This text of 270 U.S. 631 (Roberts v. Town of Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of any ground for federal jurisdiction, there having been no lack of opportunity for a hearing on the merits of the assessment, upon the authority of Hetrick v. Village of Lindsay, 265 U. S. 384; and there having been no contract within the meaning of Art. I, § 10 of the Constitution, upon the authority of Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 176-177; (2) New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Company, 142 U. S. 79, 87-88; Gulf & Ship Island R. R. Co. v. Hewes, 183 U. S. 66, 75.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 U.S. 631, 46 S. Ct. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-town-of-perry-scotus-1926.