Roberts v. Town of Perry

Supreme Court

Roberts v. Town of Perry

270 U.S. 631, 46 S. Ct. 335

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 1, 1926·No. No. 180·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of any ground for federal jurisdiction, there having been no lack of opportunity for a hearing on the merits of the assessment, upon the authority of Hetrick v. Village of Lindsay, 265 U. S. 384; and there having been no contract within the meaning of Art. I, § 10 of the Constitution, upon the authority of Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 176-177; (2) New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Company, 142 U. S. 79, 87-88; Gulf & Ship Island R. R. Co. v. Hewes, 183 U. S. 66, 75.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of any ground for federal jurisdiction, there having been no lack of opportunity for a hearing on the merits of the assessment, upon the authority of Hetrick v. Village of Lindsay, 265 U. S. 384; and there having been no contract within the meaning of Art. I, § 10 of the Constitution, upon the authority of Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 176-177; (2) New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Company, 142 U. S. 79, 87-88; Gulf & Ship Island R. R. Co. v. Hewes, 183 U. S. 66, 75.

Roberts v. Town of Perry, 270 U.S. 631, 46 S. Ct. 335 (1926).

Pincite

270 U.S. 631 (Roberts v. Town of Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related