Roberts v. Target Corporation
This text of Roberts v. Target Corporation (Roberts v. Target Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X TRACY ROBERTS,
Plaintiff, REMAND ORDER
-against- 23-cv-4662 (AEK)
TARGET CORPORATION and 5 STAR CONSTRUCTION UNLIMITED LLC,
Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------X TARGET CORPORATION,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
-against-
RWC LANDSCAPE SERVICES MANAGEMENT INC.,
Third-Party Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X RWC LANDSCAPE SERVICES MANAGEMENT INC.,
Fourth-Party Plaintiff,
5 STAR CONSTRUCTION UNLIMITED LLC,
Fourth-Party Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X THE HONORABLE ANDREW E. KRAUSE, U.S.M.J. On December 13, 2024, Plaintiff moved for leave to amend her complaint to bring a direct claim against 5 Star Construction Unlimited LLC (“5 Star”), which had previously been in the case only as a Fourth-Party Defendant. See ECF No. 68. The Court granted the motion for leave to amend on December 18, 2024, see ECF No. 74, and Plaintiff filed her amended complaint on December 19, 2024, see ECF No. 75. Because Plaintiff, a New York citizen, now brings a direct claim against 5 Star, a New York limited liability company, Plaintiff and 5 Star are now non-diverse adverse parties, and this Court no longer has jurisdiction to hear this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 based on the diversity of the parties. See Merrill Lynch & Co. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc., 500 F.3d 171, 179 (2d Cir. 2007); Rocky Aspen Mgmt. 204 LLC vy. Hanford Holdings LLC, 358 F. Supp. 3d 279, 283 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Since diversity jurisdiction was the only basis for federal court jurisdiction in this matter, see ECF No. 1 4, the absence of diversity jurisdiction means that this case must be remanded back to New York State Supreme Court, Orange County. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to REMAND this case to New York State Supreme Court, Orange County. Dated: December 20, 2024 White Plains, New York SO ORDERED. OL dasaar- i ANDREWE.KRAUSE ——™ United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberts v. Target Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-target-corporation-nysd-2024.