Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Roberts v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works

Roberts v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works

95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 14, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 101
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 12, 1918
Docket9322
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 325 (Roberts v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works, 95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 14, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 101 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under 'all the facts of the ease, the court did not err in dismissing, upon an oral motion made by the plaintiff in execution, the affidavit of illegality as amended.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 14, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-swift-co-fertilizer-works-gactapp-1918.