Roberts v. Stridiron
This text of Roberts v. Stridiron (Roberts v. Stridiron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7477
ALRICK LEWIS ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IVER STRIDIRON; HORACE MAGRAS; RUSSELL L. BORAAS; S.K. YOUNG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-237-7)
Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alrick Lewis Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D. Va.
Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberts v. Stridiron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-stridiron-ca4-2003.