Roberts v. Stridiron

Fourth Circuit

Roberts v. Stridiron

83 F. App'x 556

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2003·No. No. 03-7477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Roberts v. Stridiron, 83 F. App'x 556 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

83 F. App'x 556 (Roberts v. Stridiron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related