Roberts v. Stridiron

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 2003
Docket03-7477
StatusUnpublished

This text of Roberts v. Stridiron (Roberts v. Stridiron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Stridiron, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7477

ALRICK LEWIS ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IVER STRIDIRON; HORACE MAGRAS; RUSSELL L. BORAAS; S.K. YOUNG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-237-7)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alrick Lewis Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D. Va.

Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberts v. Stridiron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-stridiron-ca4-2003.