Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Roberts v. State

1936 OK CR 81, 60 P.2d 212, 59 Okla. Crim. 364, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 14, 1936·No. No. A-9015.·Published

Opinion

*365 PER. CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at a term of two years in the Granite Reformatory, and appeals.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on October 21, 1935. No brief has been filed in, support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

- A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*365 PER. CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at a term of two years in the Granite Reformatory, and appeals.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on October 21, 1935. No brief has been filed in, support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

- A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Roberts v. State, 1936 OK CR 81, 60 P.2d 212, 59 Okla. Crim. 364, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK CR 81 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.