Roberts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Roberts v. State

1919 OK CR 82, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 575, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 81

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 5, 1919

DocketNo. A-3201.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 82 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. State, 1919 OK CR 82, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 575, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 81 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiffs in error, Jess Roberts and •George Culbertson, were jointly tried and convicted on an information charging that they did convey and transport seven five-gallon kegs of whisky from a point unknown to a point south of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway bridge, about four miles north of the city of Muskogee, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury they were each sentenced to serve 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $200 each. From the judgments rendered on the verdicts, they appealed.

No brief had been filed, and no appearance made for plaintiffs in error when the case was called for final submission. An examination of the record shows that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgments, and that *576 no material error was committed on the trial. The judgments of the lower court are affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiffs in error, Jess Roberts and •George Culbertson, were jointly tried and convicted on an information charging that they did convey and transport seven five-gallon kegs of whisky from a point unknown to a point south of the Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway bridge, about four miles north of the city of Muskogee, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury they were each sentenced to serve 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $200 each. From the judgments rendered on the verdicts, they appealed.

No brief had been filed, and no appearance made for plaintiffs in error when the case was called for final submission. An examination of the record shows that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgments, and that *576 no material error was committed on the trial. The judgments of the lower court are affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 82, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 575, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.