Roberts v. State
This text of 23 A.D.2d 615 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court of Claims Judge not unreasonably requested submission of medical proof. It would seem that proof of disability during the 90-day period could have been readily supplied, if disability in fact existed, through hospital records or the affidavit of an attending physician. Under the circumstances of this case, and in the interest of justice, claimant should have the opportunity to supply the omission. Order reversed, on the laiw and the facts, without costs, and application remitted to the Court of Claims for the reception of further proof or other proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 615, 256 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-nyappdiv-1965.