Roberts v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Roberts v. State

593 P.2d 57, 95 Nev. 288, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 606

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedApril 18, 1979

DocketNo. 10423

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 593 P.2d 57 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. State, 593 P.2d 57, 95 Nev. 288, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 606 (Neb. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In the instant case, appellant contends that because police recovered a robbery victim’s property through an unlawful search, the district court erred by admitting the same into evidence. This contention clearly lacks merit. The apartment into which appellant fled following the crime, and in which police found the stolen property, was rented to another. Appellant’s status to complain of the allegedly unlawful search does not otherwise appear. Cf. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960).

Other assignments of error also are without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In the instant case, appellant contends that because police recovered a robbery victim’s property through an unlawful search, the district court erred by admitting the same into evidence. This contention clearly lacks merit. The apartment into which appellant fled following the crime, and in which police found the stolen property, was rented to another. Appellant’s status to complain of the allegedly unlawful search does not otherwise appear. Cf. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960).

Other assignments of error also are without merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

593 P.2d 57, 95 Nev. 288, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-nev-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack