Roberts v. State
593 P.2d 57, 95 Nev. 288, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 606
Opinion
OPINION
In the instant case, appellant contends that because police recovered a robbery victim’s property through an unlawful search, the district court erred by admitting the same into evidence. This contention clearly lacks merit. The apartment into which appellant fled following the crime, and in which police found the stolen property, was rented to another. Appellant’s status to complain of the allegedly unlawful search does not otherwise appear. Cf. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960).
Other assignments of error also are without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. State, 593 P.2d 57, 95 Nev. 288, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 606 (Neb. 1979).
593 P.2d 57 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrett v. State
775 P.2d 1276 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1989)
Hicks v. State
596 P.2d 505 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1979)