Roberts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Roberts v. State

480 S.W.3d 387, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 449, 2015 WL 1928596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 28, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101447

StatusPublished

This text of 480 S.W.3d 387 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. State, 480 S.W.3d 387, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 449, 2015 WL 1928596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joey Roberts. appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joey Roberts. appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

480 S.W.3d 387, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 449, 2015 WL 1928596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-moctapp-2015.