Roberts v. State

302 S.W.3d 226, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1756, 2009 WL 4840903
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. ED 92452·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Donald Roberts, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits after a hearing his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 302 S.W.3d 226, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1756, 2009 WL 4840903 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

302 S.W.3d 226 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batek v. Stumpf Development Corp.
302 S.W.3d 226 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)