Roberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roberts v. State

117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 132, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 311

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1923

Docket14288

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 120 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. State, 117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 132, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction of the accused, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge.

The special ground of the motion for a new trial, as to newly discovered 'evidence, does not come up to the rule that it should be neither cumulative nor impeaching and would likely produce a different result upon another trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J.; and'.Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction of the accused, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge.

The special ground of the motion for a new trial, as to newly discovered 'evidence, does not come up to the rule that it should be neither cumulative nor impeaching and would likely produce a different result upon another trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J.; and'.Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 132, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-gactapp-1923.