Roberts v. State
113 S.E. 44, 28 Ga. App. 759, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 842
This text of 113 S.E. 44 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. State, 113 S.E. 44, 28 Ga. App. 759, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 842 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
The evidence relied upon by the State to convict the defendant was entirely circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 44, 28 Ga. App. 759, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-gactapp-1922.