Roberts v. State
This text of 84 S.E. 122 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Voluntary manslaughter was not involved in the case under the evidence, and there was no error in omitting to give a charge on the subject of that grade of homicide.
(a) If voluntary manslaughter had been involved in the statement of the prisoner alone, and a charge on that subject had been desired, it should have been duly requested.
2. Where the presiding judge instructed the jury, “before you would be authorized to find the defendant guilty, gentlemen, you would have to believe that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, — not beyond any doubt, but beyond a reasonable doubt,” it was not error that the court did not in that connection go further and explain to the jury what a reasonable doubt was.
3. There was no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.E. 122, 143 Ga. 71, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-ga-1915.