Roberts v. State

856 So. 2d 1151, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16767, 2003 WL 22493298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 2003·No. No. 4D02-3139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1152]*1152 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Affirmed. As to the issue that appellant’s plea was involuntary because of misinformation as to the length of the sentence, appellant did not raise this in a motion to withdraw the plea. Our affir-mance is without prejudice to raise issue in a post-conviction motion.

STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 856 So. 2d 1151, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16767, 2003 WL 22493298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

856 So. 2d 1151 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
913 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)