Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State

537 So. 2d 198, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 208, 1989 WL 3277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 505 So. 2d 547 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1989·No. No. 87-3304·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 537 So. 2d 198, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 208, 1989 WL 3277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

537 So. 2d 198 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)