Roberts v. State

421 So. 2d 554, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roberts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 So. 2d 70
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 1982·No. No. 82-414·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Roberts appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his judgment and sentence, filed under the authority of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging that his guilty plea was involuntary. The motion shows on its face that an earlier motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea was denied by the trial judge because of lack of evidence to support Roberts’ allegations. The denial was affirmed on appeal. As to this ground, Roberts’ present motion is duplicitous and was properly denied. Doerr v. State, 275 So.2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

The only allegations concerning ineffectiveness of Roberts’ counsel deal with counsel’s pursuit of Roberts’ claim for post-conviction relief and are not proper grounds for setting aside his judgment and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. State, 421 So. 2d 554, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 554 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LeDuc v. State
415 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Gunn v. State
379 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Palmer v. State
273 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Doerr v. State
275 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)