Roberts v. State
153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon — a pistol. Code 1923, § 3485.
From the bill of exceptions it appears that the pistol shown to have been in the possession, etc., of appellant had “lost so many of its parts as to be harmless and worthless as a weapon” — that it had ceased to be a firearm.
Accordingly, the verdict of guilt, etc., cannot be allowed to stand. Redus v. State, 82 Ala. 53, 2 So. 713.
The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. State, 153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).
153 So. 663 (Roberts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Giles v. State
481 So. 2d 461 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)