Roberts v. State
This text of 153 So. 663 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon — a pistol. Code 1923, § 3485.
From the bill of exceptions it appears that the pistol shown to have been in the possession, etc., of appellant had “lost so many of its parts as to be harmless and worthless as a weapon” — that it had ceased to be a firearm.
Accordingly, the verdict of guilt, etc., cannot be allowed to stand. Redus v. State, 82 Ala. 53, 2 So. 713.
The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-alactapp-1934.