Roberts v. State

153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 1934
Docket8 Div. 871.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 So. 663 (Roberts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. State, 153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon — a pistol. Code 1923, § 3485.

From the bill of exceptions it appears that the pistol shown to have been in the possession, etc., of appellant had “lost so many of its parts as to be harmless and worthless as a weapon” — that it had ceased to be a firearm.

Accordingly, the verdict of guilt, etc., cannot be allowed to stand. Redus v. State, 82 Ala. 53, 2 So. 713.

The judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giles v. State
481 So. 2d 461 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 663, 26 Ala. App. 84, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-state-alactapp-1934.