Roberts v. Southeastern Development Corp.

398 So. 2d 922, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19700
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1981·No. No. 80-599·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse final summary judgment. We affirm the summary judgment but remand for further proceedings pursuant to Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So.2d 482 (Fla.1963); Forte v. Tripp & Skrip, 339 So.2d 698 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); and Worrell v. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc., 384 So.2d 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The pleadings, depositions, and affidavits in the record on appeal show the presence of an unresolved factual issue as to waiver of certain contractual provisions on the part of the defendant. Amendments to the pleadings should be allowed in accordance with the above authorities.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Southeastern Development Corp., 398 So. 2d 922, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

398 So. 2d 922 (Roberts v. Southeastern Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickerson, Inc. v. Rose
398 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)