Roberts v. Smith

36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 838, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 795
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

This case is controlled, adversely to the contention of the plaintiff in error, by the ruling made in the case of Truitt v. Shumate, 107 Ga. 235.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Msh, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Smith, 36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 838, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 795 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 99 (Roberts v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abernathy v. Mitchell
38 S.E. 303 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)