Roberts v. Smith

36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 838, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 795
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 99 (Roberts v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Smith, 36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 838, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 795 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Little, J.

This case is controlled, adversely to the contention of the plaintiff in error, by the ruling made in the case of Truitt v. Shumate, 107 Ga. 235.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Msh, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abernathy v. Mitchell
38 S.E. 303 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 838, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-smith-ga-1900.