Roberts v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.

Sixth Circuit

Roberts v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.

131 F. 729, 65 C.C.A. 589, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 9, 1904

DocketNo. 1,298

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 F. 729 (Roberts v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Shelby Steel Tube Co., 131 F. 729, 65 C.C.A. 589, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314 (6th Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded, with directions to remand to the state court. Petition charged concurring acts of negligence of master and servant, and was therefore not a removable case, as presenting a separable controversy between plaintiff and the corporation, and is therefore governed by Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Dixon, 179 U. S. 131, 21 Sup. Ct. 67, 45 L. Ed. 121, and Hunt v. American Bridge Co. (decided by this court at the May session) 130 Fed. 302.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded, with directions to remand to the state court. Petition charged concurring acts of negligence of master and servant, and was therefore not a removable case, as presenting a separable controversy between plaintiff and the corporation, and is therefore governed by Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Dixon, 179 U. S. 131, 21 Sup. Ct. 67, 45 L. Ed. 121, and Hunt v. American Bridge Co. (decided by this court at the May session) 130 Fed. 302.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F. 729, 65 C.C.A. 589, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-shelby-steel-tube-co-ca6-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack