Roberts v. Shaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roberts v. Shaw

639 So. 2d 697, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1994 WL 330292

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1994·No. No. 93-2418·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We consider the trial court’s order in this case as disposing of the entire action filed by appellant. We affirm the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. To the extent that the court’s order disposed of appellant’s cause of action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, which appears to be alleged, we reverse and remand to require appellees to respond to this complaint and for further proceedings thereon, including transferring the cause to the appropriate division of the circuit court.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We consider the trial court’s order in this case as disposing of the entire action filed by appellant. We affirm the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. To the extent that the court’s order disposed of appellant’s cause of action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, which appears to be alleged, we reverse and remand to require appellees to respond to this complaint and for further proceedings thereon, including transferring the cause to the appropriate division of the circuit court.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.

Roberts v. Shaw, 639 So. 2d 697, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1994 WL 330292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

639 So. 2d 697 (Roberts v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related