Roberts v. Shaw

639 So. 2d 697, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1994 WL 330292
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2418
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 639 So. 2d 697 (Roberts v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Shaw, 639 So. 2d 697, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1994 WL 330292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We consider the trial court’s order in this case as disposing of the entire action filed by appellant. We affirm the denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum. To the extent that the court’s order disposed of appellant’s cause of action under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, which appears to be alleged, we reverse and remand to require appellees to respond to this complaint and for further proceedings thereon, including transferring the cause to the appropriate division of the circuit court.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H & H DESIGN BUILDERS v. Travelers Indem.
639 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 697, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6907, 1994 WL 330292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-shaw-fladistctapp-1994.