Roberts v. Selman

128 S.E. 694, 34 Ga. App. 171, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 110
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 20, 1925·No. 16441·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The pauper’s affidavit made to obtain the writ of certiorari should allege that owing to his poverty the affiant is unable to give the required security; and where the allegation is merely that the affiant “is unable to give the security, as required by law,” the writ of certiorari (if issued) is void, the affidavit not being amendable, and the certiorari proceedings should be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 5187; Hackett v. Tate, 18 Ga. App. 453 (89 S. E. 535), and citations; Belk v. Cannon, 19 Ga. App. 487 (2) (91 S. E. 790), and citation.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts v. Selman, 128 S.E. 694, 34 Ga. App. 171, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

128 S.E. 694 (Roberts v. Selman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Talley v. Commercial Credit Co.
155 S.E. 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)