Roberts v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roberts v. Seeley

235 A.D. 654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 654 (Roberts v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Seeley, 235 A.D. 654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant Buffalo Rouyn Mines, Ltd., to answer within ten days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal. (See Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 218 N. Y. 530; Stark v. Howe Sound Co., 141 Misc. 148; affd., 234 App. Div. 904.) All concur. Present ■— Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss complaint denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant Buffalo Rouyn Mines, Ltd., to answer within ten days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal. (See Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 218 N. Y. 530; Stark v. Howe Sound Co., 141 Misc. 148; affd., 234 App. Div. 904.) All concur. Present ■— Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-seeley-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack