Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
196 Cal. 575
This text of 196 Cal. 575 (Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 196 Cal. 575 (Cal. 1925).
Opinion
In its application for a writ of supersedeas pending the final determination of this action on appeal the petitioner admits that if the judgment as rendered by the trial court is affirmed in toto no prejudice will be suffered by it. The court has this day handed down its judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court as rendered.
For that reason the writ is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 Cal. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-security-trust-savings-bank-cal-1925.