Roberts v. Sara Lee Hosiery

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMay 29, 1998
DocketI.C. Nos. 589226 R24358.
StatusPublished

This text of Roberts v. Sara Lee Hosiery (Roberts v. Sara Lee Hosiery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Sara Lee Hosiery, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Theresa B. Stephenson and the briefs submitted on appeal. Both plaintiff and defendant waived oral argument. On her appeal and based upon her assignments of error, plaintiff has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. Having reconsider the evidence of record, the Full Commissioner reverses the prior opinion and award and enters the following Opinion and Award.

****************
The Full Commission finds this fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing on 12 March 1997 as:

STIPULATIONS
1. At the time of the hearing of this matter, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer on 15 October 1994.

3. Defendant-employer was self-insured on 15 October 1994 and Constitution State Service Company was the servicing agent.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage on 15 October 1994 was $344.98, yielding a compensation rate of $229.99.

5. The alleged date of occupational exposure is 15 October 1994.

6. Plaintiff received severance pay from 16 October 1994 through 1 February 1995 in the amount of $5,157.26.

7. Plaintiff received unemployment compensation in the amount of $5,824.00.

8. The medical records of plaintiff, consisting of a medical chronology, the medical records of Dr. Nicholas Fax, Jr., the medical records of Dr. Mark Brenner, the medical records of Dillon Family Practice, the medical records of Dr. Staley Jackson, the medical records of Z. Kostecki and the medical records of Southeastern General Hospital, have been collectively marked as Stipulated Exhibit 2 and received into evidence.

9. Plaintiff's employment records, collectively consisting of Sara Lee Hosiery Nurses' Notes, 1993 and 1994 Employment Performance Summaries, 1993 and 1994 Attendance Calendars, Plant Closing Option Sheet and Job Description for AGT Operator, have been collectively marked as Stipulated Exhibit 3 and received into evidence.

10. The records of the North Carolina Employment Security Commission have been collectively marked as Stipulated Exhibit 4 and received into evidence.

11. A letter dated 13 March 1997 from Plaintiff's counsel to Dr. Z. Marek Kostecki with attachments, consisting of 4 pages, has been stipulated into evidence.

12. The deposition of Dr. Mark E. Brenner, taken on behalf of plaintiff on 9 April 1997 consisting of 29 pages, has been received into evidence.

13. The deposition of Dr. J. Nicholas Fax, taken on behalf of defendant on 29 April 1997 consisting of 20 pages, has been received into evidence.

14. All parties have been correctly designated and there is no question as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of the parties.

15. All Industrial Commission forms which are a part of this file are hereby made a part of the record.

****************
Based upon the evidence of record, the Full Commission finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing of this matter, plaintiff was a 42 year old female who had completed the twelfth grade of high school. Plaintiff's prior employment included working as a laborer at a tobacco warehouse and a job preparing salads at a restaurant.

2. Plaintiff first became employed by defendant-employer on 7 April 1978 as a slitter when defendant-employer was known as Temptation Hosiery. Ultimately, defendant became known as Sara Lee Hosiery and plaintiff's position became that of Inspect/Repair AGT Operator.

3. Plaintiff was employed with defendant-employer on first shift, which lasted 8 hours. Plaintiff worked Monday through Friday and sometimes on Saturdays as well. Plaintiff received a morning break of 10 minutes, a lunch break of 20 to 30 minutes and an afternoon break of 10 minutes.

4. Plaintiff's duties as an Inspect/Repair AGT Operator generally required her to receive pantyhose which she would place on a leg form and inspect, looking for defects. If defects were discovered, plaintiff would remove the hose from the form and turn to a sewing machine and make the necessary repairs. Plaintiff was part of a three member team which worked as a single unit and were required to inspect and repair hose at minimum production levels.

5. Plaintiff's minimum production level was approximately 120 to 150 dozen hose per day. Plaintiff often inspected and repaired 200 dozen hose per day.

6. In 1991, plaintiff began to experience numbness and tingling in her right and left hands. Plaintiff described a constant aching in her hands with associated nocturnal numbness.

7. Sometime in 1991 or 1992, plaintiff reported her symptoms to her supervisor, Mr. Dale Bass.

8. On 8 August 1991, plaintiff was seen by Shirley Hernandez, defendant's company nurse. Plaintiff complained of pain in her left wrist and right shoulder which began on 7 August 1991. Plaintiff also complained of pain in both wrists at times since 16 May 1991. Plaintiff was provided a wrist wrap. Upon leaving the clinic, plaintiff stated that she knew her symptoms were coming from her job. In turn, Shirley Hernandez informed plaintiff's supervisors.

9. Between 8 August 1991 and 15 October 1994, plaintiff continued to experience pain in her left and right hands. Plaintiff described symptoms of nocturnal numbness and of being unable to hold things in her hands without dropping them.

10. Plaintiff continued to perform all the duties of her employment and suffered no temporary total disability and requested no medical treatment. Plaintiff continued working without requesting medical treatment because she feared losing her job should she report her condition.

11. In 1994, plaintiff became aware that the defendant intended to close its hosiery operation in Lumberton, NC. On 13 June 1994, plaintiff was offered the opportunity to accept a position with one of defendant's plants located in Marion, SC; Florence, SC; Hartsville, SC; Darlington, SC; Rockingham, NC; Yadkinville, NC; Winston-Salem, NC; Clarksville, AR; and Las Cruces, NM. Due to transportation difficulties, plaintiff was unable to accept a position at any of these plants.

12. Due to the impending plant closing, plaintiff decided to further her education by attending courses at Robeson Community College. Prior to 15 October 1994, plaintiff entered the nursing assistant program at Robeson Community College and completed the basic course in the Nursing Assistant program. Plaintiff was to begin the second level of her training either in Home Health Care or Certified Nursing Assistant II, when she realized she would not be able to perform either of her duties because of the medical condition of her hands. Accordingly, plaintiff allowed her certification to lapse.

13. On 15 October 1994, defendant closed its hosiery operation in Lumberton and plaintiff was laid-off from her position. Plaintiff began receiving severance pay effective 16 October 1994 and received the same through 1 February 1995.

14. Due to continued pain involving her right hand and wrist, plaintiff sought and received approval from defendant to be seen by Dr. J. Nicholas Fax of the Coastal Plain Orthopaedic Clinic in Lumberton. Plaintiff was seen by Dr. Fax on 29 March 1995 with her primary complaints involving numbness and pain in her right arm and to a lesser extent, the left arm. It was Dr. Fax' opinion that plaintiff suffered from bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.

15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberts v. Sara Lee Hosiery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-sara-lee-hosiery-ncworkcompcom-1998.