Roberts v. Roberts

13 S.C.L. 268
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 S.C.L. 268 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Roberts, 13 S.C.L. 268 (S.C. 1822).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Huger

delivered the opinion of the court:

There is no doubt that a son may hold adversely to a parent. Their intimate connection may support a presumption against the claims of the son, but this presumption may be rebutted by evidence.

In all cases, the character of the possession is a question for the jury. In this case, the evidence was conclusive, that the defendant held the land as his own, not as his fathers. The jury have so found, and the verdict cannot, be disturbed.

The motion is refused.

Justices Johnson, Gantt, Nott and Richardson, poneurredi Justice Colcock dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. Coursey
15 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.C.L. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-sc-1822.