Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Roberts v. Roberts

144 S.E.2d 640, 265 N.C. 600, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1065

DecidedNovember 10, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E.2d 640 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Roberts, 144 S.E.2d 640, 265 N.C. 600, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1065 (N.C. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no contention that, in relation to the needs of the children, the amount of the required payments is excessive. The findings challenged by defendant relate to defendant’s ability to make such payments. However, in our view, the evidence was sufficient to support each of the challenged findings of fact; and the findings of fact fully support the judgment.

It is noted that the cause is open for furl her orders. If conditions warrant modification of the ordm of February 6, 1965, plaintiff or defendant is at liberty to move lor such modification.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no contention that, in relation to the needs of the children, the amount of the required payments is excessive. The findings challenged by defendant relate to defendant’s ability to make such payments. However, in our view, the evidence was sufficient to support each of the challenged findings of fact; and the findings of fact fully support the judgment.

It is noted that the cause is open for furl her orders. If conditions warrant modification of the ordm of February 6, 1965, plaintiff or defendant is at liberty to move lor such modification.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.E.2d 640, 265 N.C. 600, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-nc-1965.