Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Roberts v. Roberts

128 S.E.2d 127, 258 N.C. 187, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 645

DecidedNovember 21, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E.2d 127 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberts v. Roberts, 128 S.E.2d 127, 258 N.C. 187, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 645 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s complaint, while not in full detail, yet contains sufficient factual averments to survive the demurrer. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the pendente lite allowance and the amount thereof. Apparently the court failed to provide for counsel fees upon the ground the evidence showed the plaintiff was amply able to pay her own attorney. The order from which this appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s complaint, while not in full detail, yet contains sufficient factual averments to survive the demurrer. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the pendente lite allowance and the amount thereof. Apparently the court failed to provide for counsel fees upon the ground the evidence showed the plaintiff was amply able to pay her own attorney. The order from which this appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 S.E.2d 127, 258 N.C. 187, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-nc-1962.