Roberts v. Roberts

90 So. 223, 149 La. 862, 1921 La. LEXIS 1514
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 28, 1921
DocketNo. 23576
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 So. 223 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Roberts, 90 So. 223, 149 La. 862, 1921 La. LEXIS 1514 (La. 1921).

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

This suit is based on Act 25 of 1808, which provides that—

“Whenever a judgment of separation from bed and board shall have been rendered and no reconciliation between the spouses shall have taken place, the married person in whose favor the judgment of separation from bed and board shall have been rendered may, at the expiration of one year from the date that the said judgment shall have become final, apply to and obtain from the court that rendered the judgment of separation from bed and board, a judgment of final divorce from the other spouse.”

The defenses pleaded are that the judgment of separation from bed and board was obtained by fraud, and should be annulled; and that during the year since it was rendered the plaintiff has been living in open concubinage with another woman, which has rendered a reconciliation impossible.

These defenses cannot avail. The judgment in question cannot be attacked collaterally in this manner; and the statute takes no account of how the facts which it makes the grounds for divorce were brought about. Tortorich v. Maestri, 146 La. 130, 83 South. 431.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Floyd
154 So. 2d 604 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Stallings v. Stallings
154 So. 729 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 So. 223, 149 La. 862, 1921 La. LEXIS 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-la-1921.