Roberts v. Roberts
186 S.E. 192, 182 Ga. 568, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 497
Opinion
It appearing from the evidence that the transaction upon which this suit was instituted was fraudulent in its inception, and that the petitioner’s testator and the defendant were in pari delicto, equity should not interfere, but should leave the parties where it finds them. Code, § 37-112. Accordingly, the court erred in directing a verdict for the petitioner and in continuing the injunction.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberts v. Roberts, 186 S.E. 192, 182 Ga. 568, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 497 (Ga. 1936).
186 S.E. 192 (Roberts v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinney v. Atkinson
70 S.E.2d 769 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)