Roberts v. Roberts
This text of 906 So. 2d 1193 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sandra S. ROBERTS, Appellant,
v.
Mark Elliot ROBERTS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Eddie Stephen of the Law Offices of Eddie Stephens, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert M.W. Shalhoub of the Law Offices of Robert M.W. Shalhoub, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The former wife appeals the trial court's findings that temporary alimony and child support were excessive and its award of a credit for the overpayment. In approving this overpayment credit, we follow our decision on this same issue in Flores v. Flores, 874 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, (June 29, 2004). See also Dent v. Dent, 851 So.2d 819 (Fla. 2d DCA *1194 2003) (Stringer, J., concurring specially). We find the former wife's other arguments to be without merit.
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
906 So. 2d 1193, 2005 WL 1681436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-fladistctapp-2005.