Roberts v. Roberts

639 F. App'x 951
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2019
StatusPublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 951 (Roberts v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberts v. Roberts, 639 F. App'x 951 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Sue Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed in her Chapter 13 proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. Roberts, No. 5:15-cv-02099 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 5, 2015). We deny Appellant’s motion for judicial review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-roberts-ca4-2016.