Roberts v. Riddle
This text of 79 Pa. 468 (Roberts v. Riddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[470]*470Judgment was entered in the Supreme Court, November 26th 1875,
The terms of the written contract upon which the plaintiffs in error were sued in the court Relow were that they guaranteed the payment of the bond upon which it was endorsed “ according to its terms.” These terms were that it was payable at a certain day, June 23d 1872. The engagement was then to guarantee the payment of the bond “ when due.” It was determined by this court in Campbell v. Baker, 10 Wright 243, that a guaranty of the payment of a note “ when due ” is broken by nonpayment at maturity ; and the guarantor is then liable upon his contract to the creditor, who is not bound either to pursue the principal or to show his insolvency. Other cases might be cited sustaining the same principle. The affidavit of defence was therefore clearly insufficient.
Judgment affirmed..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 Pa. 468, 1875 Pa. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-riddle-pa-1875.