Roberts v. Ramey

• Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
• Decided: March 20, 2025
• Docket: 1:23-cv-00155
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION WILLIAM JEFFREY ROBERTS PLAINTIFF CAUSE NO. 1:23-CV-155-SA-RP MARSHAL RAMEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On February 28, 2025, Magistrate Judge Percy issued a Report and Recommendation [12], wherein he recommended that Roberts’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis [4] be denied and this case be dismissed on the basis of res judicata. The Report and Recommendation [12] explained the procedures pursuant to which Roberts could object. Despite being given an opportunity, Roberts has not objected to the Report and Recommendation [12] and his time to do so has now passed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (Sth Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation [12] and the record as a whole. Having done so, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Percy’s recommendation. There is no plain error on the face of the record. The Report and Recommendation [12] is ADOPTED IN FULL. The Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [4] is DENIED. This CASE is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of March, 2025. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE